Nontraditional gains from regional integration such as, insurance, bargaining power and security shall also be highlighted as advantages and disadvantages. The Judge System The judge system or bench system is currently being followed in India. But my opinion is that the main problems are caused not by these qualifications, rules or governmental restrictions. Also, if the jury trial is taking a day or longer than a bench trial, this is time you are in court and not at work yourself making money. Two of the most important are the rapid growth in the volume of litigation and a general appreciation that juries are both unpredictable and fallible. One advantage of trial by jury is public confidence. They are now independent assessors of deciding fact.
Nonetheless, the jury system is becoming increasingly controversial. No, these problems lie in the human nature and in the fact that the jurors are subject to human errors. Convincing just one juror of your innocence can be enough to result in a hung jury. The jury system needs to be reformed because of the following reasons: The jury system can be bias, jurors are not showing up to perform their civic duty and the jury system is too cumbersome and slow which makes it expensive to maintain. There are certain advantages and disadvantages to both. It seems there is a need for some reforms to be made on the current system for it to cope with modern crimes by keeping justice updated. This paper will seek to explain the difference between the jury system and judge system.
A jury is a body of people sworn to give to give a verdict in a legal case on the basis of evidence submitted to them in court. You have the right to engage a criminal defense attorney to represent you at the trial. There are six steps in the trial process; these steps include… 1754 Words 8 Pages A jury trial is most commonly used in criminal trials, but in some cases can be used in a civil trial. Or have you ever heard someone say they have to go do jury duty? Being tried by a magistrate and being tried by a jury are very different trial experiences, each with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. A jury composed of a diverse and unbiased group of people can lend some definite advantages to a person being tried for a crime. An example would be that some people are biased towards the police which is why people with specific criminal convictions are disqualified from sitting on a jury. People are forced to interrupt their lives for a trial.
A further advantage of jury equity is not having to give a reason for the verdict that they have reached. Air Asia use online reservation system for customers to book airlines tickets on 24 hours, it can increase the… 953 Words 4 Pages The evaluations of advantages and disadvantages of solar system While the majority of the world power supply by fossil fuels, such as oil, coal and natural gas, these traditional energy now are facing a number of challenges including the pollutions, rising prices and the limitation of fuel supplies. Finally, it will consider the alternatives to the current jury system. The priest dealt with all of the religious. You are to produce an essay as follows Critically evaluate pros and cons the arguments for and against trial by jury Discuss any reforms that have been proposed or introduced and evaluate these reforms pros and cons This essay will evaluate the argument for and against the jury system, discuss and evaluate proposed or recent reforms to the jury system in England and Wales. Avoiding a Judge — Although judges are law experts, no one is immune to certain prejudices and tendencies—and anyone can have a bad day.
Knight, in a gleaner article published Wednesday February 21, 2011, there is no intention to abolish the jury system, with that said the jury system can only be reformed. There are advantages and disadvantages with the use of this system but they all reflected Indian society in different ways. Cost and time Finding a jury for a trial is a time-consuming process in which the defence and prosecution must individually vet every potential jury member. The judge guides the juries in determining the facts they can admit into evidence and the ones they must exclude. While it's a common practice in the criminal justice system, plea bargaining has attracted numerous concerns that are based on the advantages and disadvantages of the concept. While the judge will generally direct the court proceedings, the jury has the final decision in the case.
The need for impartiality is demonstrated in the case of Howe v. What are the advantages to a jury trial? The State of Maharashtra, it does have many advantages. Brett Podolsky is Texas board-certified in criminal law and is a former Assistant Criminal District Attorney for the state of Texas. They discuss the evidence, analyze the case, search for alternatives and as a result, come to a fair verdict. Length In presenting the case to the jury, the lawyers will almost always take longer to explain things to a jury than they would to the judge.
In determining whether trial by jury is available for an offence, the first important question is whether the offence is of a civil or criminal nature. This essay will be looking at the advantages and disadvantages of the jury trial. At first the use of the jury was providing local knowledge and acting more like witnesses rather than the decision makers that they are seen as today. The vast majority of people who are selected for jury service are not legal experts and have no previous case knowledge, they do not have to follow previous cases or acts of parliament when deciding whether or not a person is guilty. It is important to mention that a lot of people do not actually understand what role the jury actually plays in the court case. If you want to know more on this, then learn here and get more confidence, credibility, poise and persuasiveness.
A disadvantage of a jury would be perverse decisions. The chief election officer's voting list sec. The jury gets to hear both sides of the case, view evidence, and gets to view how the defendant responds to the case. The trial Judge is there to make a decision regarding the matter of law as well as direct the court, including the jury. He or she decides whether the presented evidence warrants a guilty or not guilty verdict. Privacy - decision is made in a private room to no pressure on the jury from members of the court e.
There are also new qualifications for jury service enabling almost everyone a chance to serve on a jury and creating a cross section of society. It attempts to secure fairness in the justice system. When that trial runs for an extended period of time, those in the jury are ready to get life back to normal. Evaluate the accuracy of this statement with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, the alternatives available and any reforms that have been introduced or recommended. . At the same time, Thomas writes that some local demographical peculiarities can have an effect on the judgment, but these effects are considered to be relatively small. Having a panel of judges would be very expensive compared to a jury where they are not paid.
They have no interest in the case before them, nor is their judgment coloured by regular experience of the business of the court. The caste system was originally created to separate the early Aryans from the native Indians by the color of their skin. If a juror has any doubt about the witness testimony or evidence presented, that juror is duty bound to declare the defendant not guilty. It is hard for criminals to create a nexus with the jury members since members are picked at random from the district. It is true that some jurors do not know about the law and the responsibility that their duties carry.